Recent Question/Assignment

BLAW Essay
Part A (1000 words)
Question 1 Analyse the law
(Suggested cases)
Ermogenous v Greek Orthodox Church of SA:
*Jones V Padavattan,
* Todd V Nicol
*Rose & Frank V Crampton case ….
---What is the legal rule?
Question 2 apply the law and conclude whether Gayle will be successful in the case. Use IRAC method.
--Intention to create element 4.
--The case is not legally binding contract nor a breach of contract. Clearly it is only a casual agreement not a contract.
Here, the case study tells us that…
In conclusion, it is clear that there is NOT a binding contract between Mark and Gayle because ---------. As a result, I would not recommend Gayle sue Mark for breach …. Because
Part B (1000 words)
Question 3 – Promisory Esptopel (Case of Waltons Stores V Maher)
According to the case of Walton v Maher, Promisory Estopel is an equitable remedy which applies when -----
EXPLAIN THE LAW ONLY --- DO NOT REFER TO AAA PTY AND BBB PTYLD)
Case example -- Giumelli v Giumelli case
Question 4 – Application

Editable Microsoft Word Document
Word Count: 2456 words including References


Buy Now at $19.99 USD
This above price is for already used answers. Please do not submit them directly as it may lead to plagiarism. Once paid, the deal will be non-refundable and there is no after-sale support for the quality or modification of the contents. Either use them for learning purpose or re-write them in your own language. If you are looking for new unused assignment, please use live chat to discuss and get best possible quote.

Looking for answers ?