Recent Question/Assignment
Newcastle Business School
MNGT2006: Decision Making Under Uncertainty
Semester 2, 2020
ASSESSMENT 2 – ARGUMENTATIVE ESSAY
This assessment is for NCLE_CITY students.
Due date Friday of Week 10 by 11:59pm
Note: A late submission penalty will apply for assignments submitted after the due date/time.
Weighting 20%
Length 2000 Words
Submission Method Turnitin
Assessment Criteria Marking rubric (uploaded on Blackboard)
Feedback Provided Online and in class
Alignment to Course Learning Outcomes:
1. Evaluate decision processes, outcomes and contingencies.
2. Apply decision-making theories to case study problems and their solutions as well as to personal experience in the group assignment.
Assessment type: Written Assignment
Purpose: The purpose of this assessment is to evaluate students’ skills and abilities to deliver a well-researched argumentative essay, adopting accepted academic writing style, and fully referenced in accordance with APA 7th edition referencing style.
Description: In completing this assessment, students will deliver a well-researched, coherent argumentative essay. To successfully complete this assessment, students must demonstrate skills in research, analysis, and synthesis of arguments around decision-making theory.
Question: Write an argumentative essay, providing arguments for and against, and a justified position (conclusion) in relation to the proposition: Ultimately, individual decision making during a crisis/pandemic is based entirely on perception of risk.
*Note: Argumentative essays aim to convince the reader to accept the author’s position on a particular issue/topic/proposition or question. A fundamental aspect is that there are (at least) two sides to the argument. Both the argument and counter-argument must be evaluated using facts and evidence from relevant external sources. The author’s position and justification must be clear to the reader.
MNGT2006: Decision Making Under Uncertainty
Semester 2, 2020
ASSESSMENT 2 – ARGUMENTATIVE ESSAY
This assessment is for NCLE_CITY students.
Due date Friday of Week 10 by 11:59pm
Note: A late submission penalty will apply for assignments submitted after the due date/time.
Weighting 20%
Length 2000 Words
Submission Method Turnitin
Assessment Criteria Marking rubric (uploaded on Blackboard)
Feedback Provided Online and in class
Alignment to Course Learning Outcomes:
1. Evaluate decision processes, outcomes and contingencies.
2. Apply decision-making theories to case study problems and their solutions as well as to personal experience in the group assignment.
Assessment type: Written Assignment
Purpose: The purpose of this assessment is to evaluate students’ skills and abilities to deliver a well-researched argumentative essay, adopting accepted academic writing style, and fully referenced in accordance with APA 7th edition referencing style.
Description: In completing this assessment, students will deliver a well-researched, coherent argumentative essay. To successfully complete this assessment, students must demonstrate skills in research, analysis, and synthesis of arguments around decision-making theory.
Question: Write an argumentative essay, providing arguments for and against, and a justified position (conclusion) in relation to the proposition: Ultimately, individual decision making during a crisis/pandemic is based entirely on perception of risk.
*Note: Argumentative essays aim to convince the reader to accept the author’s position on a particular issue/topic/proposition or question. A fundamental aspect is that there are (at least) two sides to the argument. Both the argument and counter-argument must be evaluated using facts and evidence from relevant external sources. The author’s position and justification must be clear to the reader.
Looking for answers ?
Recent Questions
Module code: BMA4005-20Module title: Professional PracticeAssignment: A1. Digital PosterWord count: 500Contribution to module mark: 40% of overall gradeAssessment type: IndividualWeight 40%Submission deadline:...Assessment Criteria for Written Report (20%)• Submission of a minimum 1500 to maximum 1800-words written report due from week 9. You will submit your written report one week after you have undertaken the...Assessment 2: (20%) Case Study Presentation Due Date weeks 10This assessment builds on your theoretical knowledge and tests your ability to apply this knowledge to practice.you are required to formulate...Assessment 2Assessment 2Report: 30%Word count: 1400 – 1600 wordsDue date: Sunday of Week 8DescriptionYou are playing the role of a community service worker supporting a young adult son who is 18 years...1500-1800 wordsInstructions From TutorPlease download the eTask3 spreadsheet from Canvas and save the eTask spread as an Excel file. The main content of the force method is taught in Lectures 6,7&8.eTask3.1 is a...ASSIGNMENT INSTRUCTIONSAssessment Practical assessmentAssessment code: 011Academic Year: 2023/2024Trimester: 2Module Title: Critical Perspectives on Cross-Border BusinessModule Code: MOD009194Level: 6Module...Show All Questions