Assignment 3
Due Oct 18 by 23:59 Points 50 Submitting a file upload Available Jul 14 at 0:00 - Oct 18 at 23:59 3 months
Assessment 3 Project Plan (50%) Due Week 12.
Students need to use the knowledge gained throughout this whole unit to develop a plan or proposal for decision making and problem-solving in relation to one selected health care issue/ nursing practice. A project may cover any area of specialty nursing practice that the student feels he/she would like to improve. Students are required to identify the health care issue/ nursing practice aligned with NSQHS. Students can use the current guidelines. This assessment should include the latest research-based evidence, current practice protocols updated with the latest guidelines.
Assessment Instructions
Students need to:
Choose one specific issue or problem in the health care setting that indicates a student’s learning needs.
Write learning objectives using SMART goals.
Conduct a literature review of the chosen area. The student will be reviewing at least six articles.
Justify why this is a problem and its significance.
Design the project: method, sample, ethical consideration, data collection, data analysis.
This proposal should be concluded.
Students should include at least ten references in their reference list.
Resources to use:
Policies and procedures
Journal articles
Suggested Learning Activities:
Enquire the other health care staff about the assessment and practice
Acquire in-depth knowledge about practice protocols
Reference about the potential risks and safe practice.
Update your skills and knowledge related to the topic, by reviewing the relevant education and workshops, brainstorming of ideas with other expert health professionals.
Rubric
CP Assessment 3
CP Assessment 3
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDescription of criterion
Introduction
5.0 pts
HD
Provides a comprehensive and very clear description of the proposed clinical project. Objectives are stated in a comprehensive manner.
4.0 pts
D
Provides a very clear description of the proposed clinical project. Objectives are very clearly stated
3.0 pts
D
Provides a clear description of the proposed clinical project. Objectives adequately stated.
2.5 pts
P
Provides a description of the proposed clinical project, that needs further improvement. Objectives are stated but may need further clarifications.
2.0 pts
N1
Provides an inadequate description of the proposed clinical project. Objectives are not clear or relevant to the clinical project.
2.0 pts
N2
A very poor level of understanding of the clinical project was demonstrated. Objectives are not stated.
5.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLiterature Review
15.0 to 13.5 pts
HD
Identifies an issue aligned with NSQHS. Student has developed an exceptional and succinct literature analysis. Student organises literature in a way that provides excellent support to create project plan. Student integrates more than 10 journal articles.
13.5 to 12.0 pts
D
Identifies an issue aligned with NSQHS. Student has developed a comprehensive literature analysis and organises literature in a way that provides a very good support to create a project plan. Student integrates a minimum of 10 journal articles.
12.0 to 9.75 pts
C
Identifies an issue aligned with NSQHS. Student has developed a good literature analysis and organises literature in a way that provides mixed support to create a project plan. Student integrates a minimum of 10 journal articles.
9.75 to 9.0 pts
P
Identifies an issue aligned with NSQHS. Student has developed some literature analysis and organised literature in a way that provides an acceptable support to create a project plan. Student provides a minimum of 10 journal articles.
9.0 to 7.5 pts
N1
Fails to identify an issue aligned with NSQHS. An inadequate literature analysis whereby student does not adequately integrate the literature to create a project plan. Less than 10 journal articles are referred.
7.5 to 0 pts
N2
Fails to identify an issue aligned with NSQHS. An inadequate literature analysis whereby student does not adequately integrate the literature to create a project plan. Less than 10 journal articles are referred.
15.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeJustification
7.5 to 6.0 pts
HD
Student explains significance, implications, and relevance to practice in a very comprehensive manner.
6.0 to 4.5 pts
D
Student explains significance, implications, and relevance to practice in a very clear manner.
4.5 to 3.75 pts
C
Student explains significance, implications, and relevance to practice in an adequate manner
3.75 to 3.0 pts
P
Student explains significance, , implications, and relevance to practice
3.0 pts
N
Student failed to adequately justify significance and implications.
3.0 to 0 pts
N1
Student adequately justify significance and implications.
7.5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeProject plan
7.5 to 6.0 pts
HD
Student designed an excellent project including method, sample, ethical consideration, data collection, data analysis.
6.0 to 4.5 pts
D
Student very clearly design a project including method, sample, ethical consideration, data collection, data analysis.
4.5 to 3.75 pts
C
Student clearly design a project including method, sample, ethical consideration, data collection, data analysis.
3.75 to 3.0 pts
P
Student design a project but fails to include few subheadings from method, sample, ethical consideration, data collection, data analysis.
3.0 pts
N1
Student design a project but fails to include most subheadings from method, sample, ethical consideration, data collection, data analysis.
3.0 to 0 pts
N2
Student failed to design a project.
7.5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeConclusion
5.0 to 4.0 pts
HD
Conclusion provides a very clear summary of the presentation. No new information is provided.
4.0 to 3.0 pts
D
Conclusion provides a clear summary of the presentation. No new information is provided.
3.0 to 2.5 pts
C
Conclusion provides an adequate summary of the presentation. No new information is provided.
2.5 to 2.0 pts
P
Conclusion provides a poor summary of the presentation. No new information is provided.
2.0 pts
N1
conclusion is provided with new information.
2.0 to 0 pts
N2
Conclusion is absent and/or does not summarise the paper.
5.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePresentation
5.0 to 4.0 pts
HD
Headings are clearly labelled and the information under each heading on is very clearly presented and referenced as required
4.0 to 3.0 pts
D
Headings are clearly labelled, and the information under each heading is clearly presented and referenced as required.
3.0 to 2.5 pts
C
Not all headings are clearly provided and the information under each heading is clear and referenced as required.
2.5 to 2.0 pts
P
Headings are poorly provided and are inconsistent with the topic heading. Inconsistent referencing
2.0 pts
N1
Headings are not labelled consistently and/or unclear. The information provided is inconsistent with the topic heading. Inconsistent referencing or missing referencing.
2.0 to 0 pts
N2
Headings are not labelled consistently and/or unclear. The information provided does not match the topic heading. Inconsistent referencing or missing most referencing
5.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA Format and References
5.0 to 4.0 pts
HD
Proper and extensive referencing. Adheres to acceptable conventions with the most important and most recent resources. Accurate use of APA referencing style in all instances. A range of in-text citations have been used
4.0 to 3.0 pts
D
Paper contains less than 3 errors in grammar, punctuation, or spelling. Paper meets appropriate APA guidelines regarding margins, font, references, etc. Most content compliant with current APA writing guidelines.
3.0 to 2.5 pts
C
Paper contains less than 3 errors in grammar, punctuation, or spelling. Paper uses minimal APA guidelines regarding appropriate margins, font, references, etc. Minimal compliance with current APA writing guidelines
2.5 to 2.0 pts
P
Paper contains 5 or more grammatical, punctuation or spelling errors. Paper attempts to use some APA guidelines for appropriate margins, font, references, etc. Most of the content is not in compliance with current APA writing guidelines
2.0 pts
N
Paper contains numerous grammatical, punctuation or spelling errors throughout paper. Paper has numerous inaccuracies with the APA referencing style.
2.0 to 0 pts
N1
Paper contains many grammatical, punctuation or spelling errors. Paper does not use appropriate margins, font, references, etc. The content is not compliance with current APA writing guidelines.
5.0 pts
Total Points: 50.0