its a 750 words assignment reflective analysis i will attach the brief please follow the instruction and the requirements in the brief.
thanks.
ASSESSMENT 1 BRIEF
Subject Code and Title MGT600 Management, People and Teams
Assessment Reflective Analysis
Individual/Group Individual
Length Up to 750 words
Learning Outcomes a) Critically assess the key principles and theories underlying strategic people management and explain how their application enhances organisational and individual performance.
c) Demonstrate effective communication and practical problem-solving skills to effectively manage people in a range of organisational contexts
d) Critically reflect on the roles and functions that managers perform in the context of the challenges and risks they have to address in the changing environment.
e) Develop and justify a model of management
cognisant of the organisational minutiae to guide future practice.
Submission By 11:55pm AEST/AEDT Friday Module 2.1 (week 3)
Weighting 15%
Total Marks 15 marks
Context:
Self-awareness creates an opportunity for further development and personal success.
This reflective analysis is designed for you to explore the subject’s introductory content and importantly, identify how it relates to your own experiences and how you may use it in the future
Instructions:
You are required to write a short reflective report covering the content in the first three weeks, that is, all of module one and the first half of module two. More specifically:
MGT600_Assessment 1__Reflective Analysis.docx Page 1 of 6

· Module 1.1 - The nature of organisations, the role of management and challenges faced
· Module 1.2 - Motivation, influence and power and politics and
· Module 2.1 - Communication, conflict and negotiation
In writing your reflective analysis, you should consider the learning resources provided in the respective modules as well as reading more broadly on the relevant topics.
Think carefully about what you are reading and what has been discussed in class or in on¬line discussions. Identify the key principles and concepts and be sure you know what they mean, why they are important and how they can be applied.
Your reflective analysis write up may take a variety of forms but must be within the word limit and include:
· A short introduction.
· An analysis of the relevant module topics including their relevance to you and application.
· A short conclusion.
· Reference list.
In reflecting upon the module topics, you should explore questions such as:
1. What is in the content and why is this topic important?
2. How is the topic relevant to you?
3. What has been your past experience in this topical area?
4. What have you learnt from the content so far and how will you use it in the remainder of the subject or in your workplace?
The word limit is short, so make use of tables, figures and diagrams as these are not included in your word count.
You will be assessed against the learning rubric below and your level of insight and application of knowledge from Modules 1 and 2.1.
Referencing:
You must recognise all sources of information; including images that you can include in your work. Reference your work according to the APA 6th edition guidelines. Please see more information on referencing here http://library.laureate.net.au/researchskills/referencing
MGT600_Assessment 1__Reflective Analysis.docx Page 2 of 6

Submission Instructions:
Submit your Self-Reflective Analysis in Assessment 1 Reflective Analysis submission link in the Assessment section found in the main navigation menu of the subject Blackboard site. A rubric will be attached to the assessment. The Learning Facilitator will provide feedback via the Grade Centre in the LMS portal. Feedback can be viewed in My Grades.
Marking Rubric:
Your reports will be marked against the rubric which is show on the next pages. Please ensure that your submission addresses all five of the Assessment Attributes in the rubric.

MGT600_Assessment 1__Reflective Analysis.docx Page 3 of 6

Learning Rubric: Assessment 1 Reflective Analysis
Assessment Attributes Fail (Unacceptable)
0-49% Pass
(Functional)
50-64% Credit
(Proficient)
65-74% Distinction
(Advanced)
75 -84% High Distinction
(Exceptional)
85-100%
Limited understanding Knowledge or Thorough knowledge or Highly developed A sophisticated
Knowledge and of required concepts and understanding of the understanding of the understanding of the understanding of the
understanding knowledge field or discipline. field or discipline/s. field or discipline/s. field or discipline/s.
(technical and Supports personal
theoretical knowledge) Key components of the Resembles a recall or opinion and information Discriminates between Systematically and
assignment are not summary of key ideas. substantiated by assertion of personal critically discriminates
addressed. evidence from the opinion and information between assertion of
Understands theoretical Often confuses assertion research/course substantiated by robust personal opinion and
models and concepts of personal opinion with information materials. evidence from the research/course information
substantiated by robust
substantiated by Demonstrates a capacity materials and extended evidence from the
Percentage for this evidence from the to explain relevant reading. research/course
criterion research/course concepts. materials and extended
30% materials. Well demonstrated capacity to explain and apply relevant concepts. reading.
Mastery of concepts and application to new situations/further learning.
Limited understanding Understands the internal Understands the impact Evaluates the impact of Demonstrates cultural
Application of knowledge and of the internal and external business and external business environment including of financial, social, political, environmental financial, social, political, environmental issues on sensitivity.
reflection to practise environment.
Uses a limited range of commercial context and market forces. issues on the business. Understands the the business; and where relevant, as they relate to different countries where Analyses the impact of financial, social, political, environmental issues on
Shows a clear information as the basis Accesses relevant business. the business may the business; and where
understanding of the information. information. operate. relevant, as they relate to
MGT600_Assessment 1__Reflective Analysis.docx Page 4 of 6

practical application and implications of key concepts and principles
Percentage for this criterion
30%
of recommended practice.
Does not reflect upon own professional identity and professional practice/responsibility
Adequately utilises information from a variety of sources. Reflects on own professional identity and in relation to organisational influences and considers impact on professional practice.
Reflects on own professional identity in relation to organisation influences and impact on professional practice, modifies behaviour when necessary in reflexive act.
Understands the business and its risks.
Can prepare and presents business cases/proposals.
Reflects and evaluates own professional identity in relation to organisational influences and how this impacts on professional practice and professional responsibility
holistically.
Reflects and, modifies behaviour when necessary in reflexive manner and further reflects on professional identity.
different countries where the business may operate.
Holistic understanding of business and its risks.
Assesses the impact of information and communication systems on the operations of the business.
Critically Reflects and analyses own professional identity in relation to organisation influences and ethos. Considers how this impacts on professional practice and professional responsibility with a willingness to adapt and grow.
Modifies behaviour when necessary in reflexive manner and further reflects on professional identity.

Difficult to understand Information, arguments Information, arguments Information, arguments Expertly presented; the
Effective for audience, no and evidence are and evidence are well and evidence are very presentation is logical,
Communication logical/clear structure, poor flow of ideas, argument lacks presented in a way that is not always clear and logical. presented, mostly clear flow of ideas and arguments. well presented; the presentation is logical, clear and well supported persuasive, and well supported by evidence, demonstrating a clear
Well-structured report supporting evidence. by evidence. flow of ideas and
with clear flow of ideas Line of reasoning is Line of reasoning is easy arguments.
Percentage for this criterion
30% Audience cannot follow the line of reasoning. often difficult to follow. to follow. Demonstrates cultural sensitivity. Engages and sustains audience’s interest in the topic, demonstrates high levels of cultural sensitivity
Effective use of diverse presentation aids, including graphics and multi-media.
Correct citation of key Demonstrates Demonstrates use of Demonstrates use of Demonstrates use of Demonstrates use of
resources and evidence inconsistent use of good credible and relevant high quality, credible good quality, credible high-quality, credible
quality, credible and resources to support and relevant resources and relevant resources and relevant resources
Professional relevant resources to and develop ideas, but to support and develop to support and develop to support and develop
presentation, well support and develop these are not always ideas. arguments and arguments and position
written and meeting ideas. explicit or well statements. Shows statements. Shows
APA guidelines for referencing
Percentage for this criterion developed. evidence of wide scope
within the organisation
for sourcing evidence. evidence of wide scope within and without the organisation for sourcing evidence.
10%
MGT600_Assessment 1__Reflective Analysis.docx Page 6 of 6

MGT600_Assessment 1__Reflective Analysis.docx Page 7 of 7