Recent Question/Assignment

• Task 3 - Information
Description
Students are required to continue on with the case study from assessment 1 and 2. Students will prepare an initial assessment report and intervention plan for their fictitious placement supervisor.
This report will include:
• Completing an assessment framework including identifying and outlining risk and protective factors (see hyperlinks; Department Child Safety in assessment tab)
• Explain and apply Ecological Systems Theory to the assessment framework
• Complete an intervention plan informed by best practice and supported by literature
• Discuss and summarise a range of engagement strategies for the family

Glossary of terms:
Discuss: Provide detail about and evidence for and against two or more different views or ideas (often with reference to statement in the title); often includes explaining which views or ideas seem stronger
Explain: Provide an account of why or how a particular situation occurs, with the aim of clarifying reasons, causes and effects.
Identify: Select one or more particular examples of whatever is specified
Discuss: Present a point of view and provide a critical account noting the advantages and limitations. You must develop a logical argument
Summarise: Provide a brief statement covering the main points
Indicate the main feature of a topic or sequence of events, possibly setting them within a clear structure or framework to show how they interrelate
Resources
Case study 2019.docx

Pro forma assessment 3.docx

Please refer to your lectures and tutorials as well as readings.
Rubric
HD 85-100 D 75-84 CR 65-74 P 50-64 F
1 Create and applya family assessment framework that includes a discussion of risk and protective factors for the case

/8 Demonstrates an exceptional ability to create and apply a family assessment framework to the case study.

A minimum of 3 risk and 3 protective factors specifically related to the case study identified, discussed and linked to theory and best practice.

Including 7 or more integrated links to appropriate supporting literature.
Demonstrates an outstanding ability to create and apply a family assessment framework to the case study.

More than 2 risk and 2 protective factors specifically related to the case study identified, discussed and linked to theory.

Including 6 integrated links to appropriate supporting literature. Demonstrates a good ability to create and apply a family assessment framework to the case study.

At least 1 risk and 1 protective factors specifically related to the case study identified, discussed and linked to theory.
Including at least 5 integrated links to appropriate supporting literature. Demonstrates a satisfactory ability to create and apply a family assessment framework to the case study.

at least 1 risk and 1 protective factors specifically related to the case study identified and discussed.

Including least 2 integrated links to appropriate supporting literature. Demonstrates a poor ability to create and apply a family assessment framework to the case study.

Insufficient identification of risk and protective factors related to the case study.

No use of relevant or appropriate supporting literature.

2 Examine the ecological systems theory and critically apply to the assessment framework
/8 Demonstrates an exceptional ability to identify, define and examine ecological system theory accurately and creatively, using at least more than 3 examples relevant to the case study.

Including least 7 integrated links to appropriate and current supporting literature. Demonstrates an outstanding ability to identify, define and examine ecological system theory accurately, using at least more than 2 examples relevant to the case study.

Including least 6 integrated links to appropriate and current supporting literature. Demonstrates a good ability to identify, define and examine ecological system theory using at least 2 examples relevant to the case study.

Including least 3 integrated links to appropriate and current supporting literature. Demonstrates a satisfactory ability to identify, define and examine ecological system theory using at least 1 example relevant to the case study.

Including least 2 integrated links to appropriate supporting literature. Demonstrates a poor ability to identify correctly and examine ecological system or critically apply the assessment framework to the case study.

Inaccurate,incomplete or incoherent theory discussed, analysed or provided.

Little or no use of academic referencing.
3 Generate an intervention plan that is supported by best practice and relevant literature
/8 Demonstrates an exceptional ability to create a creative, concise intervention plan with strong links to best practice and is justified and targets the key concerns using a range of examples.

Intervention plan considers how the SW/HS may present the plan to the family.

Including least 7 integrated links to appropriate and current supporting literature. Demonstrates an outstanding ability to create a clear intervention plan with strong links to best practice and is justified and targets the key concerns using a range of examples.

Including least 5 integrated links to appropriate and current supporting literature. Demonstrates a good ability to create a clear intervention planthat acknowledges best practice and is justified and targets the key concerns using examples.

Including least 3 integrated links to appropriate supporting literature. Demonstrates a satisfactory ability to create a clear intervention plan that acknowledges best practice and is justified and targets the key concerns.

Including least 2 integrated links to appropriate supporting literature. Demonstrates a poor ability to identify generate an intervention plan or acknowledge the purpose of an intervention plan.

Failure to identify relevant best practice models.

Inaccurate, incomplete or incoherent plan attempted.

No use of literature.

4 Discusses and gives examples of engagement strategies for the family, prioritises these strategies
/8

Demonstrates an exceptional ability to identify effective engagement strategies relevant to the family in the case study.

Priorities are well justified for all family members and are grounded in best practice research andlinked the AASW Code of Ethics or ACWA.
. Demonstrates an outstanding ability to identify effective engagement strategies relevant to the family in the case study.

Priorities are well justified for most family members and are grounded in best practice research orlinked the AASW Code of Ethics or ACWA.

Demonstrates a good ability to identify effective engagement strategies relevant to the family in the case study.

Provides at least 2 priorities used for all family members.

Including least 2 integrated links to appropriate supporting, current literature.
Demonstrates a satisfactory ability to identify effective engagement strategies

Provides at least 1 priority for at least 2 family members. Demonstrates a poor ability to identify relevant or effective engagement strategies.

5 Clear argument,structure, grammar, spelling APA6 referencing, lack of plagiarism
Using relevant academic peer reviewed literature (minimum of 10)
/8 Demonstrates an exceptional ability to present a strong, clear, coherent and well structured, supportive argument.
Superior use of identified, relevant literature.
Accurately uses the conventions of sentence formation, punctuation, spelling and grammar.
Acknowledged all sources and used APA6 Demonstrates an outstanding ability to present a strong, clear, coherent and well structured, supportive
argument.
Highly effective use of identified, relevant literature.

Few identified errors within the conventions of sentence formation, punctuation, spelling and grammar.

Acknowledged all sources and used APA6 Demonstrates a good ability to present a strong argument.

Effective use of identified, relevant literature.

Some identified errors within the conventions of sentence formation, punctuation, spelling and grammar.
Acknowledged some sources Adheres to most of the APA6 referencing Demonstrates a satisfactory ability to present an argument.

Satisfactory use of Identified, relevant literature.

A number of errors identified within the conventions of sentence formation, punctuation, spelling and grammar.

Acknowledged most sources
Needs to be referred to APA6 link in text and/or reference list Demonstrates a poor ability to construct a clear or concise argument. Argument is poorly developed and the structure is unclear.

Does not identify any independent literature.

Significant errors of grammar, and/or spelling identified.
Significantly over or under the time limit
Not adhering to APA6
Plagiarism concerns identified.

case study 3

Looking for answers ?


Recent Questions