Recent Question/Assignment
Group 23 , Case9 L shaddock v Parramantta City Council (1982)
Instructions: Please read and re-read carefully to avoid mistakes.
1 Research on an Australian case on negligence from the list below (page 3).
2. Select the party you wish to represent - e Plaintiff or Defendant There is no need to choose both parties.
3. Read the original text of your case and understand it
4, Group report: Write a report outlining the following
a Case introduction.
b. The facts of the case.
c. The issues raised by both plaintiff and defendant.
d. The arguments presented by both parties.
e. The judgment of the court.
f. Critical analysis of why the court decided in favour of or against the party you chose (i.e. plaintiff or defendant). Some pants to consider for your analysis:
i. If your chosen party won the case, why was its case stronger or more compelling than the other party's case? Why did the court agree with its arguments?
ii. If your chosen party lost the case, why was its case weaker or less compelling that the other party's case? Why did the court disagree with its arguments?
Instructions: Please read and re-read carefully to avoid mistakes.
1 Research on an Australian case on negligence from the list below (page 3).
2. Select the party you wish to represent - e Plaintiff or Defendant There is no need to choose both parties.
3. Read the original text of your case and understand it
4, Group report: Write a report outlining the following
a Case introduction.
b. The facts of the case.
c. The issues raised by both plaintiff and defendant.
d. The arguments presented by both parties.
e. The judgment of the court.
f. Critical analysis of why the court decided in favour of or against the party you chose (i.e. plaintiff or defendant). Some pants to consider for your analysis:
i. If your chosen party won the case, why was its case stronger or more compelling than the other party's case? Why did the court agree with its arguments?
ii. If your chosen party lost the case, why was its case weaker or less compelling that the other party's case? Why did the court disagree with its arguments?
Looking for answers ?
Recent Questions
Assessment 2: (20%) Case Study Presentation Due Date weeks 10This assessment builds on your theoretical knowledge and tests your ability to apply this knowledge to practice.you are required to formulate...Assessment 2Assessment 2Report: 30%Word count: 1400 – 1600 wordsDue date: Sunday of Week 8DescriptionYou are playing the role of a community service worker supporting a young adult son who is 18 years...1500-1800 wordsInstructions From TutorPlease download the eTask3 spreadsheet from Canvas and save the eTask spread as an Excel file. The main content of the force method is taught in Lectures 6,7&8.eTask3.1 is a...ASSIGNMENT INSTRUCTIONSAssessment Practical assessmentAssessment code: 011Academic Year: 2023/2024Trimester: 2Module Title: Critical Perspectives on Cross-Border BusinessModule Code: MOD009194Level: 6Module...Information Systems Analysis & DesignAssignmentDue date: Week 5 Friday (5 Apr 2024) 11:59 pm AESTWeighting: 30%Length: 1,200 to 1,500 words (penalty will apply if the length is outside this limit)Assessment...Problem:University of Technology Sydney 48353: CONCRETE DESIGN Autumn 2024 - Assignment 2 (13 Marks)The figure illustrates the cross-section of a reinforced concrete column with a hexagonal shape (equal...Show All Questions