Recent Question/Assignment

MN3042QA The Context of Business
RESIT Assessment 1 – Nov 20 intake
Individual Poster Descriptive PowerPoint Slides
Deadline: Latest by 19th Oct 2021 before 3 p.m.
Assignment weighting: 20%
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This is an Individual Poster Descriptive PowerPoint Slides (max 500 words) where you will be required to demonstrate your understanding of the structures and functioning of a business. You will also show your business knowledge from the module and discuss political, economic, socio-cultural and technological elements and their impact on the business.
You have to create an Electronic Poster along with a description in the PowerPoint notes section. Be creative and use images and pictures. Your Poster should clearly tell the assessor what it is trying to convey.
Individually you will be assigned one of the following businesses:
Marks & Spencer, Tesco, Sainsbury, Nike, Apple,
Samsung, H&M, PriMark, Waitrose & John Lewis
Marking Criteria
Demonstrate business awareness and knowledge
Show understanding of the structure and functions of the business
Understand the external environment and its impact on the business
Clear and Creative Poster and Presentation
Use at least 3 academic references using journal articles and books with a Reference list using Harvard Referencing.
Grading Scheme for Assignment 1 for MN3042QA
Assignment: Poster Presentation
Marking criteria Letter grade Mark recorded
The extent to which the work shows evidence of EXCELLENT RESEARCH:
• You have undertaken EXCELLENT research demonstrated by your organisational knowledge
• Shows excellent understanding of the structure and functions of the business
• Excellent Understanding of the external environment and its impact on the business
• Exceptionally Clear and Creative Poster
• Excellent Level of professionalism in the lay out and structure/presentation with in text referencing and reference list using the Harvard referencing system
• Extensive Harvard Referencing (Minimum 3 Academic Referencing)
- Evidence of wide reading, application and referencing
A
70-100
The extent to which the work shows evidence of VERY GOOD RESEARCH:
• You have undertaken very good research demonstrated by your organisational knowledge
• Shows very good understanding of the structure and functions of the business
• Very good Understanding of the external environment and its impact on the business
• Very good/Clear and Creative Poster
• Good Level of professionalism in the lay out and structure/presentation with in text referencing and reference list using the Harvard referencing system
• Harvard Referencing (Minimum 3 Academic Referencing)
- Evidence of some reading, application and referencing. Need to focus on Harvard Referencing
B
60-69
The extent to which the work shows GOOD/REASONABLE RESEARCH:
• You have undertaken good research demonstrated by your organisational knowledge
• Shows reasonable understanding of the structure and functions of the business
• Reasonable Understanding of the external environment and its impact on the business
• Poster needs more clarity
• Acceptable Level of professionalism in the lay out and structure of the Poster with some incorrect in text referencing and reference list
• Harvard referencing needs improvement.
• Acceptable Evidence of reading, application and referencing.
C
50-59
The extent to which the work shows adequate, but limited and weak research:
• You have undertaken limited research demonstrated by your organisational knowledge
• Understanding of the structure and functions of the business needs more work
• Understanding of the external environment and its impact on the business needs more clarity
• Poster needs more clarity
• Inadequate Level of professionalism in the layout and structure/presentation with in text referencing and reference list using the Harvard referencing system
Some evidence of reading, that is, Harvard referencing needs improvement
D
40-49
Does not address the assignment criteria. Presents minimal material related to the topic. Little evidence of understanding of the theory. Poor structure. Little evidence of scholarship and Harvard referencing Condoned Pass
F1
30-39
Learning Outcomes not met Fail 0-29