Recent Question/Assignment
Discussion:
• There is much further depth required to meet the criteria on rubrics when you are being asked to critically discuss and critically analyse. This moves beyond merely describing events or processes and requires you to make much deeper links that are supported by theory and evidence-based literature.
° For example, you may include the pathophysiology of a disease process, but unless you can explain the link between the patient and their conditions, this does not demonstrate sufficient critical analysis or understanding
• Your discussion needs to utilise high quality academic sources to support your arguments, and refrain from using consumer websites
Slides:
• Avoid text heavy slides which can detract from the meaning being presented on the slide. Stick to your main points (e.g., 3-5 points per slide), and verbally explore the points further.
• Try to use diagrams, pictures/images or schematics which can break the slides up, as well as aid visual learners. However, these need to be relevant to the discussion
• Ensure all slides and diagrams are referenced
• Consider the use of an appropriate font type, colour and size to ensure ease of reading for the audience.
• Proof read your work for grammatical errors, spelling mistakes or issues with punctuation. Remember, this is a piece of academic writing and needs to be at a high standard.
Oral presentation:
• Avoid simply reading from your notes/slides
• Ensure your discussion flows logically, i.e. you should still introduce your presentation, the discuss your main arguments and then finish off with a conclusion
• Be succinct but include everything that you need to include. Remember, you have a time limit and you do not get the option to deliver your information in another capacity
• Practice, practice, practice, and only start recording when everything is ready to go and you are confident
Please refer to the marking guide and rubric on page 15 of the NRSG265 unit outline for more information and guidance.
If you have any questions about the assessment, please post it on Assessment questions discussion forum on your campus tile.
• There is much further depth required to meet the criteria on rubrics when you are being asked to critically discuss and critically analyse. This moves beyond merely describing events or processes and requires you to make much deeper links that are supported by theory and evidence-based literature.
° For example, you may include the pathophysiology of a disease process, but unless you can explain the link between the patient and their conditions, this does not demonstrate sufficient critical analysis or understanding
• Your discussion needs to utilise high quality academic sources to support your arguments, and refrain from using consumer websites
Slides:
• Avoid text heavy slides which can detract from the meaning being presented on the slide. Stick to your main points (e.g., 3-5 points per slide), and verbally explore the points further.
• Try to use diagrams, pictures/images or schematics which can break the slides up, as well as aid visual learners. However, these need to be relevant to the discussion
• Ensure all slides and diagrams are referenced
• Consider the use of an appropriate font type, colour and size to ensure ease of reading for the audience.
• Proof read your work for grammatical errors, spelling mistakes or issues with punctuation. Remember, this is a piece of academic writing and needs to be at a high standard.
Oral presentation:
• Avoid simply reading from your notes/slides
• Ensure your discussion flows logically, i.e. you should still introduce your presentation, the discuss your main arguments and then finish off with a conclusion
• Be succinct but include everything that you need to include. Remember, you have a time limit and you do not get the option to deliver your information in another capacity
• Practice, practice, practice, and only start recording when everything is ready to go and you are confident
Please refer to the marking guide and rubric on page 15 of the NRSG265 unit outline for more information and guidance.
If you have any questions about the assessment, please post it on Assessment questions discussion forum on your campus tile.
Looking for answers ?
Recent Questions
Assessment Criteria for Written Report (20%)• Submission of a minimum 1500 to maximum 1800-words written report due from week 9. You will submit your written report one week after you have undertaken the...Assessment 2: (20%) Case Study Presentation Due Date weeks 10This assessment builds on your theoretical knowledge and tests your ability to apply this knowledge to practice.you are required to formulate...Assessment 2Assessment 2Report: 30%Word count: 1400 – 1600 wordsDue date: Sunday of Week 8DescriptionYou are playing the role of a community service worker supporting a young adult son who is 18 years...1500-1800 wordsInstructions From TutorPlease download the eTask3 spreadsheet from Canvas and save the eTask spread as an Excel file. The main content of the force method is taught in Lectures 6,7&8.eTask3.1 is a...ASSIGNMENT INSTRUCTIONSAssessment Practical assessmentAssessment code: 011Academic Year: 2023/2024Trimester: 2Module Title: Critical Perspectives on Cross-Border BusinessModule Code: MOD009194Level: 6Module...Information Systems Analysis & DesignAssignmentDue date: Week 5 Friday (5 Apr 2024) 11:59 pm AESTWeighting: 30%Length: 1,200 to 1,500 words (penalty will apply if the length is outside this limit)Assessment...Show All Questions