Assignment 1

Due date: 26 August 2016

1. Overview

This assessment is designed to test your achievement of selected learning objectives of Modules 2 to

5. In particular, the assignment involves flood frequency analyses and working with historical streamflow and rainfall data.

The assignment is intended to reinforce and extend your knowledge on hydrological methods and the (substantial) uncertainty associated with design flood estimation.

The purpose of the assignment is to estimate design flood discharges for the Emu Creek at Emu Vale streamgauge site (Queensland gauge 422313B) for a range of average recurrence intervals (2, 5, 10, 20, 50 and 100 year ARIs). The flood frequency analysis (FFA) will be based on consideration of the outputs of three techniques: Annual Series, Partial Series and the new Regional Flood Frequency Estimation (RFFE) developed as part of the AR&R update (Rahman et al, 2015).

The assignment is based on the following main tasks:

• Obtaining and reviewing the streamflow data

• Annual Series FFA based on fitting a log Pearson 3 (LP3) distribution to annual discharge maxima

• Partial Series FFA based on monthly discharge maxima

• Design discharge estimation using the RFFE method. A catchment plan will be also be prepared.

• Compilation of the estimates and selection of a set of design flood discharges, based on consideration of the above outputs

• Assessment of the rainfall frequency associated with the January 2011 flood event

• Preparation of an assignment report

2. Assignment Tasks

2.1. Streamflow Data

BASIC STREAMGAUGE DATA

Streamflows and relevant gauging information for station 422313B can be downloaded from the Queensland DNRM Water Monitoring Portal https://water-monitoring.information.qld.gov.au/

Access the Portal and find the streamgauge data. Tabulate the following basic gauge information: location (latitude and longitude), the catchment area, when streamgauging started, when rainfall measurements started, the maximum observed instantaneous discharge and when this occurred, and the maximum observed daily total rainfall and when this occurred.

The hydraulic control and associated rating curve are also of interest. Include in your report a photograph of the control weir and an image of the creek cross section at the streamgauge.

Provide an image of the rating curve and the flood gaugings that have been undertaken at the site.

How many gaugings have been done to the end of 2013? What is the highest gauging (level and discharge) and how does this compare with the highest recorded flood? Make a comment of the adequacy of the rating curve based on this information, especially the reliability of the discharges associated with the largest floods.

MISSING DATA

Download the monthly discharge data from the start of record to the end of the 2014/2015 water year (October-September). Generate a timeseries plot of monthly peak discharges. What percentage of the data is missing (code 255)?

2.2. Annual Series FFA

The Annual Series FFA is to be first undertaken on the following basis:

• Include data for all water years from the start of record to the end of 2014/2015.

• Exclude from the analysis the water years that have 4 or more months of missing flow data. AR&R recommends several approaches to handle missing data, but this simple exclusion method will be used. This may require an adjustment to the number of years of available data N.

• Fit a LP3 distribution to the Annual Series, estimate 5% and 95% confidence limits and prepare a flood frequency chart. Extract the design discharge estimates for the specified ARIs.

Once you complete the above analysis, you will find that the Annual Series has a negative high skew. This is due to the presence of a few very small discharges. Including these floods may result in a poor LP3 fit to the much higher major floods, and thus influence the design discharge estimates in this range ( 10 year ARI). AR&R 1987 provides recommendations on removing low outliers or the possible deletion of the lower portion of the Annual Series to improve the LP3 fit. The following approach is suggested:

• Exclude the lowest 9 floods from the Annual Series and repeat the LP3 analysis. You will need to reduce N and also make adjustments to the probability estimates. ARR&R 1987 provides technical guidance on low flows and an extract from this document is included on Studydesk as a resource (File ExtractAR&R1987.pdf)

2.3 Partial Series FFA

The Partial Series FFA is to be undertaken on the following basis:

• Use the monthly discharge maxima to extract the Partial Series. Monthly discharge maxima are acceptable for small catchments as typically the peaks between months are sufficiently separated by time to be hydrologically independent.

• Use the monthly discharge data from the start of record to the end of the 2014/2015 water year.

• For months with missing data, assume that no floods occurred during these periods. This assumption differs to that made in the Annual Series, so may give a different N to use in the analysis. The value of N can be non-integer.

• Current Australian Rainfall and Runoff (AR&R 1987) recommendations suggest the Partial Series threshold should be selected such that K (the number of independent flood peaks above the threshold) is between N and 3N. (N is the number of years of streamflow data). For consistency, use K equal to N in defining the Partial Series threshold.

• Plot the Partial Series and, from fitting a suitable regression line, provide design discharge estimates for the specified ARIs. It is appropriate to exclude large floods from the regression analysis.

• Prepare a Partial Series flood frequency chart

2.4 RFFE design discharge estimates

The Regional Flood Frequency Estimation (RFFE) approach to estimate design peak discharges up to 1% AEP for Australian small to medium sized rural catchments has been developed as part of the AR&R update. The RFFE method supersedes the probabilistic Rational Method recommended in AR&R 1987. A draft online tool has been developed to generate RFFE estimates that depend on catchment location and this website can be found at http://rffe.arr.org.au/.

Details of the RFFE can be found in Rahman et al (2015). Generate a set of design discharge estimates for the Emu Creek catchment using the RFFE method. Also provide a map showing the catchment boundary and the location of the catchment centroid. A base map, obtained from the QTopo online mapping system, can be downloaded from StudyDesk (File QTopo_A3)

2.5 Assessment of January 2011 flood rainfalls

The largest recorded floods have an impact on the fitting of a LP3 probability distribution to the Annual Series, more so than the frequent minor floods. It is thus worthwhile investigating the top ranked floods in some detail.

BOM have prepared detailed reports on notable floods in Australia and Queensland reports are available from http://www.bom.gov.au/qld/flood/fld_reports/reports.shtml. There are no flood reports for the relatively small Emu Creek. However, the February 2009 flood of the Burdekin River provides a typical example of the contents of a flood event report (this report is referred to in the Study Book Module 2).

Download the Burdekin River February 2009 flood report and familiarise yourself with how the hydrological data is analysed and presented. In this part of the assignment, you will be undertaking a frequency analysis of the observed rainfall intensities (but not to the level of detail covered in this example report).

Available pluviograph data is limited for the Emu Creek catchment. Rainfall measurements are recorded at the streamgauge and the more recent January 2011 flood was selected for analysis. This is the second ranked flood on record. The objective of the analysis is to determine the frequency of the observed rainfall that fell during the January 2011 flood event.

The rainfall analysis involves the following tasks:

• Access the Water Monitoring Portal, find and plot the recorded flood hydrograph for the January 2011 flood. Include in the plot at least 2 days of flow record after the flood peak and at least 3 days of record prior to the peak. Generate a plot of rainfall data for the same period of time. These plots can be generated online using the Water Monitoring Portal.

• From the plots, you will be able to identify the period of rainfall that was associated with the flood. Download 15 minute rainfalls for this period of time.

• Access the BOM IFD site and download the 2013 AR&R IFD data for the gauge location. It is appropriate to use this data as it represents the latest estimates of rainfall frequency.

• Estimate the time of concentration of the Emu Creek catchment (refer to Section 5.3.2 of the Study book).

• Estimate the approximate AEP of the observed rainfall depth for the duration corresponding to the time of concentration (round off to the nearest hour). Estimate the corresponding AEP of the 2011 flood discharge (use the Annual Series plotting position estimate).

The probabilistic Rational Method assumes that a flood discharge of a certain frequency is caused by design rainfall of the same frequency (corresponding to the catchment time of concentration). The above analysis demonstrates how this may not be the case for ‘real’ floods.

2.6 Compile and select design discharge estimates

Compile the design discharge estimates for the Annual Series (both scenarios), the Partial Series and RFFE analyses as a table. Plot the discharge estimates on the same graph against ARI. It is recommended that an undistorted linear scale (both horizontal and vertical) be used so that the differences in the design discharge estimates at moderate-to-large floods ( 10 year ARI) can be clearly seen.

Select design discharge estimates for each of the required ARI. It may not be appropriate to choose design discharges from the same method across the full range of ARIs. Provide statements that justify the choice of design discharge for each ARI.

2.7 Prepare assignment report

For reasons of consistency, a report template (ENV3105Report1Template2016.docx) must be downloaded from Study Desk and used to report your work. Complete each section of the report.

3. Submission

Your submission for Assignment 1 should include:

• The assignment report that documents the hydrological analyses that have completed (refer Section 2.7)

• An EXCEL spreadsheet containing your hydrological computations. Multiple spreadsheets will not be accepted – instead put your workings in separate sheets within the one EXCEL file. Include a list indicating the contents of each sheet to aid marking the above report.

A marking scheme is provided as Table 1. Use this marking scheme to check that you have addressed the full scope of the work.

If an element of the assignment has not been documented in the file report than no marks will be given for that element. Cut and paste relevant outputs from the EXCEL spreadsheet as required to provide the required documentation.

Part of the available marks has been allocated to reward reporting that is well set out and easy to follow. Submissions that are untidy and/or poorly structured and thus difficult to assess will attract less marks for this element.

Electronic submission of this assignment is required. One ZIP file will be accepted containing:

1. A single pdf document based on the template provided (rename the file based on the convention below)

2. A single EXCEL spreadsheet

The following filename convention shall be used: *Ass1.zip, *Ass1.pdf and *Ass1.xlsx, where * is your full name.

4. Marking Scheme

The marking scheme proposed for Assignment 1 is presented in Table 1.

Table 1: Assignment 1 Marking Scheme

Assignment element Total

Annual Series FFA

Basic streamgauge data and rating curve 25

Missing data (timeseries plot and % missing) 10

Annual Series including low floods (missing data table, ranked discharges table)

20

Annual Series statistics (with and without low floods) 10

Annual Series FFA charts and design discharge estimates 30

Partial Series FFA

K and threshold discharge 5

Partial Series discharge table 10

Regression plot, fitted equation 10

Partial Series FFA chart and design discharge estimates 20

RFFE FFA

Catchment plan showing boundary and centroid 20

RFFE inputs 5

RFFE design discharge estimates 10

Assessment of January 2011 flood rainfalls

Flood hydrograph and rainfall plots 10

IFD table 10

Table of January 2011 storm details 10

Selection of design discharge estimates

Table of discharge estimates 5

ARI-discharge plot 10

Selection of design discharges with justification 10

Reporting

Assignment report 10

Assignment EXCEL spreadsheet 10

TOTAL MARKS 250

5. References

Rahman, A. K. Haddad, G. Kuczera and E. Weinmann. 2015 ARR - A Guide to flood estimation. Chapter 3 Regional Flood Methods. Available to download http://www.arr.org.au/arr- guideline/books-and-chapters/

Due date: 26 August 2016

1. Overview

This assessment is designed to test your achievement of selected learning objectives of Modules 2 to

5. In particular, the assignment involves flood frequency analyses and working with historical streamflow and rainfall data.

The assignment is intended to reinforce and extend your knowledge on hydrological methods and the (substantial) uncertainty associated with design flood estimation.

The purpose of the assignment is to estimate design flood discharges for the Emu Creek at Emu Vale streamgauge site (Queensland gauge 422313B) for a range of average recurrence intervals (2, 5, 10, 20, 50 and 100 year ARIs). The flood frequency analysis (FFA) will be based on consideration of the outputs of three techniques: Annual Series, Partial Series and the new Regional Flood Frequency Estimation (RFFE) developed as part of the AR&R update (Rahman et al, 2015).

The assignment is based on the following main tasks:

• Obtaining and reviewing the streamflow data

• Annual Series FFA based on fitting a log Pearson 3 (LP3) distribution to annual discharge maxima

• Partial Series FFA based on monthly discharge maxima

• Design discharge estimation using the RFFE method. A catchment plan will be also be prepared.

• Compilation of the estimates and selection of a set of design flood discharges, based on consideration of the above outputs

• Assessment of the rainfall frequency associated with the January 2011 flood event

• Preparation of an assignment report

2. Assignment Tasks

2.1. Streamflow Data

BASIC STREAMGAUGE DATA

Streamflows and relevant gauging information for station 422313B can be downloaded from the Queensland DNRM Water Monitoring Portal https://water-monitoring.information.qld.gov.au/

Access the Portal and find the streamgauge data. Tabulate the following basic gauge information: location (latitude and longitude), the catchment area, when streamgauging started, when rainfall measurements started, the maximum observed instantaneous discharge and when this occurred, and the maximum observed daily total rainfall and when this occurred.

The hydraulic control and associated rating curve are also of interest. Include in your report a photograph of the control weir and an image of the creek cross section at the streamgauge.

Provide an image of the rating curve and the flood gaugings that have been undertaken at the site.

How many gaugings have been done to the end of 2013? What is the highest gauging (level and discharge) and how does this compare with the highest recorded flood? Make a comment of the adequacy of the rating curve based on this information, especially the reliability of the discharges associated with the largest floods.

MISSING DATA

Download the monthly discharge data from the start of record to the end of the 2014/2015 water year (October-September). Generate a timeseries plot of monthly peak discharges. What percentage of the data is missing (code 255)?

2.2. Annual Series FFA

The Annual Series FFA is to be first undertaken on the following basis:

• Include data for all water years from the start of record to the end of 2014/2015.

• Exclude from the analysis the water years that have 4 or more months of missing flow data. AR&R recommends several approaches to handle missing data, but this simple exclusion method will be used. This may require an adjustment to the number of years of available data N.

• Fit a LP3 distribution to the Annual Series, estimate 5% and 95% confidence limits and prepare a flood frequency chart. Extract the design discharge estimates for the specified ARIs.

Once you complete the above analysis, you will find that the Annual Series has a negative high skew. This is due to the presence of a few very small discharges. Including these floods may result in a poor LP3 fit to the much higher major floods, and thus influence the design discharge estimates in this range ( 10 year ARI). AR&R 1987 provides recommendations on removing low outliers or the possible deletion of the lower portion of the Annual Series to improve the LP3 fit. The following approach is suggested:

• Exclude the lowest 9 floods from the Annual Series and repeat the LP3 analysis. You will need to reduce N and also make adjustments to the probability estimates. ARR&R 1987 provides technical guidance on low flows and an extract from this document is included on Studydesk as a resource (File ExtractAR&R1987.pdf)

2.3 Partial Series FFA

The Partial Series FFA is to be undertaken on the following basis:

• Use the monthly discharge maxima to extract the Partial Series. Monthly discharge maxima are acceptable for small catchments as typically the peaks between months are sufficiently separated by time to be hydrologically independent.

• Use the monthly discharge data from the start of record to the end of the 2014/2015 water year.

• For months with missing data, assume that no floods occurred during these periods. This assumption differs to that made in the Annual Series, so may give a different N to use in the analysis. The value of N can be non-integer.

• Current Australian Rainfall and Runoff (AR&R 1987) recommendations suggest the Partial Series threshold should be selected such that K (the number of independent flood peaks above the threshold) is between N and 3N. (N is the number of years of streamflow data). For consistency, use K equal to N in defining the Partial Series threshold.

• Plot the Partial Series and, from fitting a suitable regression line, provide design discharge estimates for the specified ARIs. It is appropriate to exclude large floods from the regression analysis.

• Prepare a Partial Series flood frequency chart

2.4 RFFE design discharge estimates

The Regional Flood Frequency Estimation (RFFE) approach to estimate design peak discharges up to 1% AEP for Australian small to medium sized rural catchments has been developed as part of the AR&R update. The RFFE method supersedes the probabilistic Rational Method recommended in AR&R 1987. A draft online tool has been developed to generate RFFE estimates that depend on catchment location and this website can be found at http://rffe.arr.org.au/.

Details of the RFFE can be found in Rahman et al (2015). Generate a set of design discharge estimates for the Emu Creek catchment using the RFFE method. Also provide a map showing the catchment boundary and the location of the catchment centroid. A base map, obtained from the QTopo online mapping system, can be downloaded from StudyDesk (File QTopo_A3)

2.5 Assessment of January 2011 flood rainfalls

The largest recorded floods have an impact on the fitting of a LP3 probability distribution to the Annual Series, more so than the frequent minor floods. It is thus worthwhile investigating the top ranked floods in some detail.

BOM have prepared detailed reports on notable floods in Australia and Queensland reports are available from http://www.bom.gov.au/qld/flood/fld_reports/reports.shtml. There are no flood reports for the relatively small Emu Creek. However, the February 2009 flood of the Burdekin River provides a typical example of the contents of a flood event report (this report is referred to in the Study Book Module 2).

Download the Burdekin River February 2009 flood report and familiarise yourself with how the hydrological data is analysed and presented. In this part of the assignment, you will be undertaking a frequency analysis of the observed rainfall intensities (but not to the level of detail covered in this example report).

Available pluviograph data is limited for the Emu Creek catchment. Rainfall measurements are recorded at the streamgauge and the more recent January 2011 flood was selected for analysis. This is the second ranked flood on record. The objective of the analysis is to determine the frequency of the observed rainfall that fell during the January 2011 flood event.

The rainfall analysis involves the following tasks:

• Access the Water Monitoring Portal, find and plot the recorded flood hydrograph for the January 2011 flood. Include in the plot at least 2 days of flow record after the flood peak and at least 3 days of record prior to the peak. Generate a plot of rainfall data for the same period of time. These plots can be generated online using the Water Monitoring Portal.

• From the plots, you will be able to identify the period of rainfall that was associated with the flood. Download 15 minute rainfalls for this period of time.

• Access the BOM IFD site and download the 2013 AR&R IFD data for the gauge location. It is appropriate to use this data as it represents the latest estimates of rainfall frequency.

• Estimate the time of concentration of the Emu Creek catchment (refer to Section 5.3.2 of the Study book).

• Estimate the approximate AEP of the observed rainfall depth for the duration corresponding to the time of concentration (round off to the nearest hour). Estimate the corresponding AEP of the 2011 flood discharge (use the Annual Series plotting position estimate).

The probabilistic Rational Method assumes that a flood discharge of a certain frequency is caused by design rainfall of the same frequency (corresponding to the catchment time of concentration). The above analysis demonstrates how this may not be the case for ‘real’ floods.

2.6 Compile and select design discharge estimates

Compile the design discharge estimates for the Annual Series (both scenarios), the Partial Series and RFFE analyses as a table. Plot the discharge estimates on the same graph against ARI. It is recommended that an undistorted linear scale (both horizontal and vertical) be used so that the differences in the design discharge estimates at moderate-to-large floods ( 10 year ARI) can be clearly seen.

Select design discharge estimates for each of the required ARI. It may not be appropriate to choose design discharges from the same method across the full range of ARIs. Provide statements that justify the choice of design discharge for each ARI.

2.7 Prepare assignment report

For reasons of consistency, a report template (ENV3105Report1Template2016.docx) must be downloaded from Study Desk and used to report your work. Complete each section of the report.

3. Submission

Your submission for Assignment 1 should include:

• The assignment report that documents the hydrological analyses that have completed (refer Section 2.7)

• An EXCEL spreadsheet containing your hydrological computations. Multiple spreadsheets will not be accepted – instead put your workings in separate sheets within the one EXCEL file. Include a list indicating the contents of each sheet to aid marking the above report.

A marking scheme is provided as Table 1. Use this marking scheme to check that you have addressed the full scope of the work.

If an element of the assignment has not been documented in the file report than no marks will be given for that element. Cut and paste relevant outputs from the EXCEL spreadsheet as required to provide the required documentation.

Part of the available marks has been allocated to reward reporting that is well set out and easy to follow. Submissions that are untidy and/or poorly structured and thus difficult to assess will attract less marks for this element.

Electronic submission of this assignment is required. One ZIP file will be accepted containing:

1. A single pdf document based on the template provided (rename the file based on the convention below)

2. A single EXCEL spreadsheet

The following filename convention shall be used: *Ass1.zip, *Ass1.pdf and *Ass1.xlsx, where * is your full name.

4. Marking Scheme

The marking scheme proposed for Assignment 1 is presented in Table 1.

Table 1: Assignment 1 Marking Scheme

Assignment element Total

Annual Series FFA

Basic streamgauge data and rating curve 25

Missing data (timeseries plot and % missing) 10

Annual Series including low floods (missing data table, ranked discharges table)

20

Annual Series statistics (with and without low floods) 10

Annual Series FFA charts and design discharge estimates 30

Partial Series FFA

K and threshold discharge 5

Partial Series discharge table 10

Regression plot, fitted equation 10

Partial Series FFA chart and design discharge estimates 20

RFFE FFA

Catchment plan showing boundary and centroid 20

RFFE inputs 5

RFFE design discharge estimates 10

Assessment of January 2011 flood rainfalls

Flood hydrograph and rainfall plots 10

IFD table 10

Table of January 2011 storm details 10

Selection of design discharge estimates

Table of discharge estimates 5

ARI-discharge plot 10

Selection of design discharges with justification 10

Reporting

Assignment report 10

Assignment EXCEL spreadsheet 10

TOTAL MARKS 250

5. References

Rahman, A. K. Haddad, G. Kuczera and E. Weinmann. 2015 ARR - A Guide to flood estimation. Chapter 3 Regional Flood Methods. Available to download http://www.arr.org.au/arr- guideline/books-and-chapters/

COURSE:Master of Business AdministrationMaster of Business ResearchUnit: Organisational Learning and ChangeUnit Code: BUS 510Type of Assessment: Assessment 2 – Individual essayUnit Learning Outcomes addressed:...3000 words marketing plan for marketing subject. this assignment build on previous assignment. i will attach to you the previous work and the brief for this work.i have to stay with the same organization...2500 words assignment business environment subject.this assignment built on previous assignment and discussion forums and all the previous work were about Bunnings Warehouse. and the chosen organization...AssignmentTechnical Education Development Institute (TEDI) PROVIDER NUMBER: 22300 CRICOS NUMBER: 03221G Level 1, 212 King Street, Melbourne, Victoria – 3000 Ph: 03 9043 3926, Fax: 03 8678 0671 www.tedi.vic.edu.au...Week 8 & 9 — Health Economic EvaluationQuestion 44. Develop a proposal for an economic evaluation of a health intervention (treatment or screening program) of your choice.a. Who is the Population targeted?b....ASSESSMENT BRIEFSubject Title Business PrinciplesSubject Code MGTF101Lecturer / Tutor Catherine BaartzTrimester February 2019Assessment Title Assessment 2 - Business ReportLearning Outcome/s 1, 2 &...**Show All Questions**