This is a Literature review and please find below on what needs to be done.

Structure
Introduction 1 page or 300 words
Outline of Key Objectives
Focus
Set of themes
Explanation and Evaluation
Conclusion (summarize your findings)
Gaps
Speculation
Total Length 1500 words.

How does the finding in one support to the other?

The marker will be more familiar with OD models and
Lot about case
Synthesize the research of the literature you found
Why this piece of literature is relevant

Do more than summarize
Give enough information to provide context
Construct an argument
-Conclusion reaches and any concerns
-Questions Remaining
-Gaps

With the End result
-Don’t go stronger or weaker than the research shows.

Tone
-Be Respectful
-Writer and reviewer has a voice
-Support the work of others

The References need to be Accurate to the content written and had to be in Harvard Style.

The Case study can be found in the attachment.

Also, please find the Marking Criteria for the assessment listed below.

Assessment 1
Literature Review
Due date
15 August 2015
Weighting
40%
Length
1500 words
Learning outcomes
Assessment 1 is related to course learning outcomes 1, 2, 3, 5, 6
Format
Essay style
Objective
This Assessment gives you the opportunity to enhance your research, analysis, and written communication skills, particularly in identifying the literature and concepts to be applied in the later assessment.
Task
Select a case to work on for both Assessment 1 and 2 Task: Write an Essay containing:
(1) an introduction identifying the case you have selected and identifying the key issues
(2) a literature review of key concepts and research findings related to your case, and which you will use to critique the case study in Assessment 2 Report

ASSESSMENT CRITERIA
Research
A thorough knowledge of the relevant material demonstrated through use of an appropriate body on quality sources
40%
Analysis
Identification of the issues, critical analysis, and clear argument supported by evidence
30%
Presentation
A structure with a clear introduction, well organised material, and a strong conclusion. Correct referencing of sources and use of at least 10 academic sources
15%
Communication
Clear and concise written communication, including grammar
10%
Engagement/ group work
For those who worked in groups, this mark will be attributed to evidence of group participation and quality of reflective log
For individuals, this mark is for demonstrated engagement in the discussion forum
5%